Agenda item

Physical Activity in Schools

Physical activity in the Borough’s schools has been identified as being lower than the national average and within the North Staffordshire region.   The Scrutiny Committee wishes to focus particularly on primary schools and the support they receive.  Members of the Active and Cohesive Scrutiny Committee have been invited to the meeting to contribute to the discussion.  Supporting information has been requested and it is hoped that this will be circulated prior to the meeting. 

 

A number of stakeholders will be present at the meeting including:-

 

·        Cllr Ben Adams (Staffordshire County Council – Portfolio Holder for Learning and Skills)

 

·        Mr Mark Thornewill (Director for Sport across Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent)

 

·        Mr Alan Stancliffe (Head Teacher Reginald Mitchell Primary School)

 

·        Marc Neeld (Public Health Officer)

Minutes:

The Chair welcomed Members of the Active and Cohesive Overview and Scrutiny Committee to the meeting who had been invited to contribute to the item on physical activity.  He also welcomed the attendance of Cllr Ben Adams (Portfolio Holder for Learning ad Skills), Nicola Day (Public Health Commissioning Lead: Physical Activity and Nutrition), Mr Mark Thornewill (Director for Sport across Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent) and Mr Stancliffe (Head Teacher – Reginald Mitchell Primary School). 

 

The Chair stated that the item for Scrutiny had come about as a consequence of receiving a presentation on the Health and Well Being Strategy.  The amount of physical activity in primary schools in the Borough was the lowest in the North Staffordshire area and well below the national average.  He was pleased that the County Council had submitted a comprehensive document on the issue to the Committee which had been circulated on the previous evening.  Another concern of the Committee was the fact that in the Borough’s health profile there was an above average level of obesity in year 6 pupils. 

 

The Chair invited Mr Stancliffe to give a statement on the subject of physical activity in primary schools.  He stated that one area which his Primary School suffered from was the lack of available sports facilities at the school.  He wanted to have 16 sessions a week, but due to the lack of available facilities he could only have 10.  The figures on physical activity in school were three years old.  At that time, there was much more funding available and so there were often extra events, training and internal competitions. Some of the funding available in 2009 had been stopped on the formulation of the coalition Government in 2010.  He however wanted to stress the importance of the Sports Associations and the continued importance of voluntary work in the organisation of competitions and leagues.  Much of this work was still active but would not be included in the official figures.  It was this hidden sport which was as important as official school activity.  It was critical not to lose the goodwill of volunteers as without them the situation would be much worse.

 

Mr Stancliffe identified Ofsted as being a major issue for schools.  Their intensity was causing staff to go into their shells where the delivery of school sport was considered.  Until Ofsted said they were going to scrutinise P.E in schools it would not be perceived as a priority.  Schools were not as committed to extra-curricular activity through a fear of Ofsted. Staffordshire County Council had helped to develop the Healthy Schools programme.  This was no longer funded and so schools had to pay a fee to Entrust if they wished to participate in the programme.  For schools it was just one of many programmes which were offered.  He described the overall situation in primary schools as the worst time in twenty years. 

 

A Member asked why schools were so fearful of Ofsted in the matter of P.E.  In response Mr Stancliffe stated that when schools were in special measures, Ofsted appeared to only wish to focus on Maths and English.  As a consequence schools in special measures would often do no real sport for 2-3 years.  

 

The Chairman invited the Director for Sport across Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent to give his views on the current situation of physical activity within schools.  He stated that the County Sports Partnership had been formed in 2006 and were contracted by Sports England to provide services.  Sports England had changed the age groups that they were focussing their efforts on; it was now from age 11 onwards. Sports England would be investing Lottery Funding in 2013-14 and 2014-15 to build capacity in County sports Partnerships to strengthen links between primary schools and sports.  This was a very new piece of work and he would be meeting with heads forums to identify how best to support them.  He stressed the importance of using coaches and making activity fun for young people. 

 

The Chairman invited Cllr Ben Adams (Portfolio Holder for Learning and Skills) to talk on the subject of physical activity in schools.  He stated parents had a significant influence on child activity levels and activity outside of the school environment was of equal importance to that provided in schools.  Nationally schools no longer had a statutory responsibility for offering two hours of high quality Physical Education and 1 hour of additional sport either within the curriculum or as an extra-curricular offer.  With the National Curriculum changes due to come into effect in September 2014, the only remaining statutory responsibility for sport and PE was for children to be expected to be able to swim 25m unaided by year 6 and for outdoor education and dance to be provided as an integral part of the curriculum. 

 

Cllr Adams stated that it was important to ensure the sustainability of projects and to have good connections with the sports clubs and schools.  The scrutiny process had made him aware of the lack of recent data on physical activity in primary schools and they were actively looking at ways to solve this problem. He believed in recording physical activity data.  They had to go beyond just looking at physical activity in schools.  It was important to capture the activity outside of schools.  It was a very important subject with future health implications.  He stressed that schools were autonomous and the County Council’s role was one which was supportive.  He wanted more parents to ask their Heads and Chair of Governors about physical activity in schools to raise its profile.  Effective commissioning was critical which incorporated a level of monitoring the success of any project. 

 

The Public Health Commissioning Lead for Physical Activity and Nutrition stated that she agreed with Cllr Adams that it would be desirable to record the amount of physical activity completed outside of schools.  The challenge was the process undertaken to capture this data.  There were some potential mechanisms being explored which were alluded to in the information pack provided to Members of the Committee.  The Health and Well Being Strategy recognised that traditional services had been commissioned to deal with problems once they had become apparent such as morbid obesity.  It was important though to look at things more preventatively such as through the encouragement of a healthy lifestyle.  It was clearly a large piece of work to decide the actions that would be taken to improve physical activity in all age groups.  How physical activity was co-ordinated was crucial, it was not just about high level sport but about healthy daily living. 

 

A Member in response to the statements stated that they were fully in agreement with diversification in physical activity.  Dancing and skateboards were good examples of fun activity which would help to encourage some youngsters to become more active. 

 

A Member stated the outcome of improving physical activity was important because of the effect on the next generation.  He believed all local authorities should commit themselves to delivering state of the art facilities for young people.  A Member added that it was important that the best use was made of facilities.  Cllr Adams in response to comments from Members stated that whilst capital expenditure on sporting facilities was important this was not the only area where progress could be made.  Some activity could be done without any capital expenditure, such as walking. 

 

The Chair stated that he was concerned about the lack of data, which had been acknowledged.  He was also disappointed that Entrust had not sent a representative to the meeting.  He felt there should be as few non-swimmers at the end of year 6 as possible and Entrust were partly responsible for delivering the swimming service to schools.  He believed it was a lost opportunity for Entrust to engage with the Council.  In response Cllr Adams stated that Entrust believed they could not contribute any more than the information they had already provided to the Committee by written representation. 

 

Cllr Adams stated that he would feedback into the Health and Well-Being Board at County level on the discussion.  He thanked the Committee for asking him to attend and to contribute to the debate.

 

The Chairman thanked all of the external speakers for their attendance on behalf of the Committee.