Agenda and minutes

Conservation Advisory Working Party - Tuesday, 20th December, 2016 7.00 pm

Venue: Committee Room 1. Civic Offices, Merrial Street, Newcastle-under-Lyme, Staffs ST5 2AG

Contact: Geoff Durham 

Items
No. Item

1.

Declarations of Interest

To receive Declarations of Interest from Members on items included in this agenda

 

Minutes:

There were no declarations of interest stated.

2.

Minutes of previous meetings pdf icon PDF 67 KB

To consider the minutes of the previous meeting(s)

Minutes:

Resolved:                 That the minutes of the meeting held on 29 November, 2016 be agreed as a correct record.

3.

Previously Considered Applications pdf icon PDF 81 KB

To receive the decisions of applications which have been previously considered by this Working Party

Minutes:

Resolved:               That the decisions on applications previously considered by this Working Party be received.

4.

New Applications Received pdf icon PDF 54 KB

To make observations on new applications received.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Resolved:-    That the following observations be made on the application listed below:-

 

31 Nantwich Road, Audley  16/00774/FUL

 

The Working Party thinks the details suggest that not enough care and attention has

been given to the existing house.  The entrance is a peculiar design and the size and

shape of the windows are out of character with the existing buildings.

 

Hillcrest, The Holborn, Madeley   16/01022/FUL

 

The Working Party stand by their comments to the earlier scheme (16/00707/FUL) with regard to particular character of these burgage plots.  The scheme has made improvements to the size and style of the properties which are more acceptable but the Working Party still objects due to the fact that the number of properties is still too high and the proposal creates a density which is harmful to the character of the Conservation Area.  They are concerned about the arbitrary plot which is left landlocked to the rear of the site.

 

 

Barnes Hall, Lindsay Hall and Horwood Hall, Keele University  16/01014/FUL, 16/01015/FUL & 16/01016/FUL

 

The Working Party has considered the information for the applications and generally welcomes the quality of the submission and the fact that the envelope of the halls are staying the same, not encroaching onto new green spaces and the respect has been given to trees and the special landscape character.  The architects have created interesting spaces and landscapes and the crisp quality buildings are commended.  There are no objections to Barnes and the creation of a new sense of place will be an asset to this Hall.

Some members are disappointed at the loss of some of the earlier buildings on the campus especially at Horwood.  Earlier University buildings have evolved to create a sense of character, an approach which reinforces the existing qualities of the park and gardens at Keele, being relatively small scale and in recognisable materials. 

They Working Party strongly objects however to the limb at Lindsay (L1) which they feel is designed at the expense of the sense of place.    They feel this large 7 storey building will be harmful to the vistas from the motorway and is therefore unsympathetic and harmful to the character of the historic park and garden in this location.  They refer to Pevsner who says a “sense of living in landscape should always be present”.  Pevsner also states that from the motorway, Lindsay is “like a grown hill-town far away from England”.  This will be lost with the obtrusive L1 building.  The other proposed buildings are well orientated at Lindsay and follow the contours.

They are very concerned about the loss of car parking from Horwood and the general impact that this will have on the village given the increase in room numbers.

 

5.

Urgent Business

To consider any business which is urgent within the meaning of Section 100B(4) of the Local Government Act, 1972.

Minutes:

There was no Urgent Business.