Venue: Committee Room 1. Civic Offices, Merrial Street, Newcastle-under-Lyme, Staffs ST5 2AG
Contact: Geoff Durham
No. | Item | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Declarations of Interest To receive Declarations of Interest from Members on items included in this agenda
Minutes:
Councillor Naylon declared an interest in item no. 5 and left the room during the discussion. Councillor Allport declared an interest in representing Talke, under item 4.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Minutes of previous meetings To consider the minutes of the previous meeting(s) Minutes: Resolved: That the minutes of the previous meeting held on 17th August 2015 be agreed as a correct record.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Previously Considered Applications To receive the decisions of applications which have been previously considered by this Working Party Minutes: Resolved: That the decisions on applications previously considered by this Working Party be received. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
New Applications Received To make observations on new applications received. Additional documents:
Minutes: Resolved:- That the following observations be made on the applications listed below:-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Conservation and Heritage Fund To consider any applications for financial assistance from the Conservation and Heritage Fund which may have been brought to this meeting by the officer Minutes: Smithy House, Highway Lane, Keele (£210) and St Thomas Church, Mow Cop (£3,834)
Resolved: That the Planning Committee be advised that the Working Party recommends that both of these grants be offered to the applicants.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Shop Front Design Guide Minutes:
Resolved: The Working Party fully supports the guide and members will direct any individual comments to the Conservation Officer.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Urgent Business To consider any business which is urgent within the meaning of Section 100B(4) of the Local Government Act, 1972. Minutes: The Working Party considered revised plans for 15/00498/FUL and felt the revisions created a fussy appearance and that it was not an improvement on the previous plan which was simpler. They also preferred that the ground floor treatment of the link was in a blue brick rather than a grey render.
Resolved: That the comments be noted |