Agenda and minutes

Venue: Hybrid Meeting - Castle. View directions

Contact: Geoff Durham 742222  01782 742222

Media

Items
No. Item

1.

APOLOGIES

Minutes:

There were no apologies.

2.

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

To receive Declarations of Interest from Members on items included on the agenda.

Minutes:

There were no declarations of interest stated.

3.

MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING(S) pdf icon PDF 247 KB

To consider the minutes of the previous meeting(s).

Minutes:

Resolved:                 That the minutes of the meeting held on 2 March, 2021 be agreed as a correct record.

4.

APPLICATION FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT - 2-4 MARSH PARADE, NEWCASTLE . MARSH BOX DEVELOPMENTS LTD. 20/00559/FUL pdf icon PDF 136 KB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Resolved:     That theremoval of Conditions 7 & 8 of 17/00722/FUL permitted

but the following conditions are now necessary to reflect the information submitted:

 

(i)            Tree Protection Measures fully implemented and

maintained;

(ii)          The recommendations of the Arboricultural Method Statement fully implemented and maintained;

(iii)         Soft and hard landscaping to be fully implemented prior to the occupation of the development;

(iv)         Suitable replacement tree planting if the Lime tree dies within 5 years.

 

and subject to the imposition of all other conditions attached to

planning permission 17/00722/FUL that remain relevant at this

time.

5.

APPLICATION FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT - LAND TO NORTH OF SHELTON BOULEVARD, THE SOUTH OF NEWPORT LANE AND IN BETWEEN FESTIVAL WAY AND THE A500 (QUEENSWAY), AND LAND AT GRANGE LANE, WOLSTANTON. CITY OF STOKE-ON-TRENT COUNCIL. 20/00630/FUL pdf icon PDF 131 KB

This item includes a supplementary report.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Resolved:     That the variation of Condition 2 of 17/00834/FUL be permitted,

subject to the imposition of all other conditions attached to

planning permission 17/00834/FUL that remain relevant at this

time, amended as necessary.

6.

APPLICATION FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT - LAND OFF BACK LANE AND MUCKLESTONE ROAD, MARKET DRAYTON. SHROPSHIRE. MRS CAROL CARLYLE. 21/00003/FUL pdf icon PDF 144 KB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Resolved:     That the application be permitted, subject to the undermentioned

conditions:

 

(i)         Time limit condition

(ii)        Approved plans

(iii)       No commercial use

(iv)       Submission of Construction Management Plan

(v)        Restriction on external lighting

(vi)       Adequate control of animal waste

7.

APPLICATION FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT - THORP PRECAST, APEDALE ROAD, CHESTERTON. HARVEY THORP. 21/00038/FUL pdf icon PDF 297 KB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Resolved:     That the removal of Conditions 9 & 10 of 20/00354/FUL be permitted but the following condition to be included

 

The development hereby permitted shall be carried out and

implemented in strict accordance with the mitigatory measures set out in the ‘Report on the Assessment of Coal Mining Legacy

and Risk to Surface Stability’ (January 2021) by D J Erskine.

 

and subject to the imposition of all other conditions attached to planning permission 20/00354/FUL that remain relevant at this time.

8.

APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT - 2 NEWCASTLE ROAD, MADELEY. MRS KIMBERLEY GABRIELCZYK . 20/00971/FUL pdf icon PDF 164 KB

This item includes a supplementary report

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Councillor Gary White spoke on this application.

 

Amended condition (v) proposed by Councillor Reddish and seconded by Councillor Burgess.

 

 

Resolved:     That the application be permitted subject to the undermentioned conditions:

 

(i)         Time limits

(ii)        Approved plans

(iii)       Facing materials

(iv)       Provision of access, parking and turning prior to

occupation.

(v)        Access shall be a maximum of 3m wide and surfaced in a

bound material for a minimum of 5m from the site boundary in accordance with details that shall have been approved by the LPA beforehand.

(vi)       Garages to be retained for parking and cycles

(vii)      Gates to open away from the highway

(viii)     Construction hours

(ix)       Noise levels

(x)        Electric vehicle charging.

9.

APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT - 22 KING STREET, CROSS HEATH. MR K NIJJAR. 21/00067/FUL pdf icon PDF 193 KB

This item includes a supplementary report.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Resolved:     That a decision on the application be deferred until the 27th April

meeting, to allow time for the comments of the Highways Authority to be received and such views to be taken into consideration by the Planning Committee in its decision.

 

10.

APPLICATION FOR OTHER DEVELOPMENT - 4, ROE LANE, NEWCASTLE-UNDER-LYME. MR. & MRS. HALLIDAY. 21/00122/FUL pdf icon PDF 145 KB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Resolved:     That the application be permitted, subject to the undermentioned conditions:

 

(i)         Time limit condition

(ii)        Approved Plans

(iii)       Materials

11.

APPLICATION FOR OTHER DEVELOPMENT - 1 BERESFORD CRESCENT, NEWCASTLE UNDER LYME. DR SHAMYLLA SAMAD. 21/00054/FUL pdf icon PDF 166 KB

This item includes two supplementary reports

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Councillor Simon Tagg spoke on this application.

 

Amended recommendation proposed by Councillor Holland and seconded by Councillor Northcott.

 

Councillor Simon Tagg, speaking on behalf of residents stated that there were four areas of objection to this application: the design and scale of the proposed extension; highways and parking concerns; impact on trees and the extent to which the property was to be used as a House in Multiple Occupation.  The extension detracted materially from the character of the original dwelling and the design of a group of dwellings forming the street scene which went against Policy H18 (design for residential extensions).  The Highways Authority had objected to the parking provision as there was only space provided for two vehicles.

 

Plans and photographs were shown to Members.

 

Councillor Holland supported the objections raised by Councillor Tagg.  The extension did not sit behind the development line of Beresford Crescent. Reference was made to the Landscape Development Section’s comments regarding the tree root protection areas being unaffected if only two parking spaces were provided.  The Highways Authority stated that a development of that size required off-street parking for three vehicles.  The existing garage could not count as a parking space as it was not 3m by 6m internally and the applicant had already stated that the garage space would be used for cycle storage.

 

The property in the past had been used as a HMO and there were concerns that the extension, including the additional bedroom space would again be used for that purpose.  Larger HMO’s came under a different use class.  If this was to be used as a family home, Councillor Holland stated that he would like to see three parking spaces within the curtilage and, if it were to be used as a HMO he would expect to see three spaces minimum.  Finally, with regard to the impact on the root protection area, the applicant had indicated that the roots from a mature highways tree intruded very slightly on the proposed development.  Councillor Holland stated that the tree was already there and the proposed development would infringe on the root protection area by 1.7m.

 

Councillor Moffat had concerns as to the size of the proposed extension and close proximity to the pavement and agreed with previous comments of Members. 

 

Councillor Northcott was concerned about it becoming a HMO which would be wrong in this area.  He would second the proposal to refuse on the grounds that it was far too big and for the objections received from County Highways.

 

Councillor Reddish also shared concerns about the size and the massing and, should it become a HMO, huge concerns regarding parking.  A possibility could be another application with the extension set back by as much as a metre.

 

Councillor John Williams stated that this had been a Bourneville Development and a garden village.  The extension was too large for a family home and suspected that it would become a HMO.

 

Councillor Jones had concerns about the massing of the proposal and  ...  view the full minutes text for item 11.

12.

APPLICATION FOR OTHER DEVELOPMENT - OAKLEY HALL, OAKLEY, MARKET DRAYTON. MR AND MRS GHANI. 21/00219/LBC pdf icon PDF 164 KB

This item includes a supplementary report.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Resolved:     That the application be permitted subject to the undermentioned

conditions:

 

(i)         Time limit.

(ii)        Approved plans.

(iii)       Prior approval of the bricks, including the provision of

samples, to be used in

this repair and reinstatement of the rear elevation including method statement for structural repair of the rear gable.

(iv)       Prior approval of full details for the proposed window and

door

(v)        In all other respects the permitted repairs and alterations

shall be carried out in accordance with the submitted details.

13.

APPLICATION FOR OTHER DEVELOPMENT - BETLEY COURT, MAIN ROAD, BETLEY. DR NIGEL WILLIS BROWN AND OTHERS. 21/00109/FUL & 21/00110/LBC pdf icon PDF 163 KB

This item includes a supplementary report

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Resolved:     That the application be permitted subject to the undermentioned conditions:

 

(i)         Time limit.

(ii)        Works to be undertaken in accordance with the approved

plans and details set out in the supporting documents.

14.

COMMITTEE SITE VISIT DATES 2021-2022 pdf icon PDF 13 KB

Minutes:

Resolved:     That the site visit dates, as set out in the agenda report, be

agreed.

15.

URGENT BUSINESS

To consider any business which is urgent within the meaning of Section 100B(4) of the Local Government Act, 1972

Minutes:

There was no Urgent Business.