Agenda and minutes

There were no apologies received

Members stood in silent tribute to Councillor Eileen Braithwaite who had recently passed away.

Councillor Loades declared an interest as a ward member in item 4, Tadgedale Quarry, Mucklestone Road, Loggerheads and Councillor S Hambleton declared an interest in item 7, land west of Ravens Close, Bignall End as a board member of the Aspire Housing Group.

To consider the minutes of the previous meeting(s).

Resolved:              That the minutes of the meeting held on 26 April 2016 be agreed as a correct record.

Resolved:     That the application be refused for the following reasons:

(Proposed by Councillor Loades and seconded by Councillor Fear)

Refused on same grounds as 15/00015/FUL that the development would constitute unsustainable development by reason of its location and lack of accessibility to services and facilities including Mucklestone Primary School there being no suitable and safe footpath access to that school from the development. The development would result in a high level of private car use having regard to its location and limited bus services with additional reasons relating to the following:

(i)               In the absence of a planning obligation securing the long

term maintenance and management of public open space on the site, the development would not be acceptable

(ii)              In the absence of a planning obligation, and having

regard to the likely additional pupils arising from a development of this scale and the capacity of existing educational provision in the area, the development fails to make an appropriate contribution towards primary school provision, contrary to policy.

(iii)            In the absence of a planning obligation the development

fails to provide 25% of the total number of proposed dwellings as affordable dwellings which are required to provide a balanced and well-functioning housing market.

(iv)            In the absence of a planning obligation towards Travel

Plan monitoring costs, the required contribution to sustainable transport measures would not be secured in accordance with policy.

(v)             In the absence of a planning obligation towards the

provision of a travel plan for St. Mary’s CE Primary School, the required contribution to sustainable transport measures, would not be secured in accordance with policy.

Resolved:    That the application be refused for the following reasons:

(Proposed by Councillor Fear and seconded by Councillor Northcott)

Loss of amenity as a result of on street parking arising from inadequate on-site parking provision.

Resolved:    That the application be refused for the following reason:

(Proposed by Councillor Fear, seconded by Councillor S Hambleton)

The colour of the proposed material is not in keeping with and would be harmful to the character and appearance of the Conservation Area.

(Proposed by Councillor Turner, seconded by Councillor Burgess)

Resolved:    That consideration of this item be deferred for a site visit.

(Proposed by Councillor Loades, seconded by Councillor Mancey)

Resolved:     That the application be permitted subject to the undermentioned conditions:

(i)               Approval of details of appearance, landscaping, layout

          and scale (hereinafter called "the reserved matters" and

as defined in the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) Order 2015, as amended, or any Order revoking and re-enacting that Order) shall be obtained from the Local Planning Authority in writing before any development hereby approved is commenced.

(ii)              Application for approval of the reserved matters shall be

made to the Local Planning Authority before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission. The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of two years from the date of approval of the last of the reserved matters to be approved.

(iii)            The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in

accordance with the following approved plans and supporting information unless superseded by plans approved for outstanding reserved matters applications;

·                  Location plan (scale 1/2500), received by the Local

           Planning Authority on 21 April 2016

·                 Drawing no. 4224-01-03, received by the Local Planning Authority on 21 April 2016

·                 Transport Planning Paper dated the 23 February 2016

·                 Preliminary Risk Assessment (Desk Study) dated the 8^th June 2015

·                 Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey by Rachel Hacking Ecology

(iv)            Development should not commence until sufficient site

investigation works have been undertaken to adequately assess the nature and extent of any land contamination on the site. The scope of site investigation works should be submitted to, and approved in writing by, the local planning authority. The works must be undertaken by competent persons and in accordance with the requirements of:

•         BS10175 (2011) + A1 (2013) Investigation of

           Potentially Contaminated Sites – Code of Practice

•         BS8576 (2013) Guidance on Investigations for Ground Gas - Permanent Gases and Volatile Organic Compounds

The findings of the site investigation should be used to assess the potential risks from land contamination to:

•         Human health

•         Controlled water

•         Property

•         Ecological systems

•         Archaeological sites and ancient monuments

A report of the results of the site investigation works, together with a risk assessment should be submitted to, and approved in writing by, the local planning authority.

Reason: To ensure that risks from land contamination to the future users of the land and neighbouring land are minimised, together with those to controlled waters, property and ecological systems, and to ensure that the development can be carried out safely without unacceptable risks to workers, neighbours and other offsite receptors in accordance with National Planning Policy Framework 2012.

(v)             Development shall not commence until a detailed

remediation scheme to bring the site to a condition suitable for its intended use by removing unacceptable risks has been submitted to, and approved in writing by, the local planning authority. The scheme must include:

•         All remediation works to be undertaken

•         Proposed remediation objectives and remediation criteria

•         Site management procedures

(vi)            The approved remediation scheme must be carried out  ...  view the full minutes text for item 9.

Resolved:    That the application be permitted subject to the undermentioned conditions:

(i)              Time limit.

(ii)             In accordance with the approved plans.

(iii)            Materials as per application.

Resolved:    That the application be permitted subject to the undermentioned conditions:

(i)              Time limit condition.

(ii)             Development to be carried out in accordance with the approved plans and submitted details.

Resolved:    That the application be permitted subject to the undermentioned conditions:

(i)              Time limit.    

(ii)             In accordance with the approved plans.

(iii)            No more than 9 wedding ceremonies shall be held in the barn and the garden (combined) in any calendar year.

(iv)           Compliance with the recommended mitigation measures of the noise management plan at all times that a wedding is taking place.

(v)            Car parking to be within the field – accessed from Main Road as per existing arrangements.

(vi)           Removal of the marquee within the residential curtilage when not in use.

Resolved:     That the decision be noted.

Resolved:                 That agreement be given to the making of Article 4 Directions

Resolved:                 That agreement be given to the making of Article 4 Directions

Resolved:     That the recommendations be accepted

Resolved:     That the information be received

Resolved:     That the recommendations be accepted.

There was no Urgent Business.