Agenda item

New Applications Received

To make observations on new applications received.

Minutes:

Resolved:-   That the following observations be made on the applications listed below:-

 

App No

Proposed development and name of applicant

Comments

 

 

 

 

15/00392/FUL

Keele Leisure Centre,  Keele University

No objections.

 

 

 

15/00423/ADV

Laura Ashley, 45-47 High Street, Newcastle  

No objections.

 

 

 

 

15/00424/LBC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15/00432/ADV

 

 

 

15/00479/ADV

15/00480/FUL

15/00487/LBC

 

15/00519/FUL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15/00465/FUL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15/00369/ADV

Aston Cottage, 201 School Lane, Aston.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 non-illuminated fascia sign and 1 non illuminated entrance sign.

 

Nat West Bank, 75 High Street, Newcastle

 

 

Heron Foods Ltd, 10 Castle Walk, Newcastle

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land west of Domvilles Farm, Barthomley Road, Audley

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lindsay Hall Block, Keele university

The Working Party is happy with the general principle of the proposal but concerned about the details which are sketchy and materials which are unspecified.  Request that a method statement be conditional on any permission and for Conservation Officer to monitor.

 

No objections.

 

 

 

No objections.

 

 

 

The Working Party would prefer that a more recessive colour was negotiated for the units on the rear wall or that a better design for the roof scheme was proposed which would be less intrusive.

 

The Working Party did not object to the proposed house being situated away from the main farmstead as historically this is often the case.  However the proposed dwelling at its current scale was considered excessive and should be more recessive in every aspect.  The quality of the architecture is not good enough and will detract from the setting of the listed farmstead and compete with it.  A suggestion was given for a more modern ecological approach with a much lower roof pitch.

 

No objections.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supporting documents: