Agenda and minutes

Conservation Advisory Working Party - Tuesday, 28th July, 2015 7.00 pm

Venue: Committee Room 1. Civic Offices, Merrial Street, Newcastle-under-Lyme, Staffs ST5 2AG

Contact: Geoff Durham 

Items
No. Item

1.

Declarations of Interest

To receive Declarations of Interest from Members on items included in this agenda

 

Minutes:

Mr C Wakeling declared an interest as a Fellow of Keele University

2.

Minutes of previous meetings pdf icon PDF 28 KB

To consider the minutes of the previous meeting(s)

Minutes:

Resolved:              That the minutes of the meeting held on 7 July, 2015 be agreed as a correct record.

3.

Previously Considered Applications pdf icon PDF 40 KB

To receive the decisions of applications which have been previously considered by this Working Party

Minutes:

Resolved:               That the decisions on applications previously considered by this Working Party be received.

4.

New Applications Received pdf icon PDF 27 KB

To make observations on new applications received.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

 

Resolved:-   That the following observations be made on the applications listed below:-

 

App No

Proposed development and name of applicant

Comments

 

 

15/00498/FUL &

15/00499/LBC

Maxims  - Application for Planning Permission for the erection of a care village development (Use Class C2)  for elderly people comprising a new three and four storey  building with a 74 bed care home and 28 care apartments , linked to the conversion of the former Maxims nightclub  building for ancillary uses (offices, tea rooms, a hair salon,  community heritage gallery and training space) including  access, car parking, amenity areas, landscaping and associated works.

LBC application is for repair, alteration and selective demolition (of rear extensions only) comprising internal and external works-

(Prime (UK) Developments Ltd)

 

 

The Working Party welcomes the restoration of this building; it considers that the scheme looks to be of high quality; it welcomes the relatively intense use of the site which reflects the historical position; is inclined to accept the demolition of the ancillary elements although it should be remembered that these do form part of the Listed building; welcomes the making of a feature of the bay window; and is inclined to approve of the general massing of the new building. It does have a concern that insufficient space has been allowed between the rear of Maxims and the new 3 storey development and that Maxims may appear ‘crowded’ as a consequence. If approval is being considered conditions should be included requiring details of any new openings to the Listed building to be approved, together with floor level changes. Conditions should also be included with respect to any new fixings within the Listed building, air conditioning piping and vents, and at a minimum a watching archaeological brief be secured. The importance of a high quality palette of material is indicated and some concern expressed that the vertically aligned brick coping feature to the new building may be prone to weather damage and that the proposed flat roof construction may similarly lead to maintenance issues

 

 

 

15/00520/FUL &

15/00529/COUNOT

2-10 Hassell Street, Newcastle – Alterations to external appearance of building and prior notification for change of use to residential

 (Hind Property)  

With respect to 15/00520/FUL the Working Party expressed concerns about the Hassell Street elevation treatment – the proposed fenestration neither picking up the height and rhythm of the windows of the adjacent Listed bank building nor the retained fenestration below. Concern also expressed about the introduction of timber – a simpler palette of materials is preferred. With respect to the proposals for the eastern and southern elevations of the element closest to Barracks Road, if windows are to be infilled that should be achieved by recessed brickwork rather than render. No comments to make on application 15/00529/COUNOT

 

 

 

 

15/00571/FUL

 

 

 

 

26 Mount Pleasant, Newcastle – proposed detached dwelling

(Mr T Gibbins)

 

The Working Party had no objections to the proposal.

 

 .

 

 

 

   .

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.

Urgent Business

To consider any business which is urgent within the meaning of Section 100B(4) of the Local Government Act, 1972.

Minutes:

The officer drew attention to the Secretary of State’s decisions issued on 20th  July 2015 with respect to the appeals made against the Borough Council’s decisions with respect to proposals for residential development at the Hawthorns, Keele (application 13/00424/FUL) and the associated application for conservation area consent for the demolition of certain buildings on that site (application 13/040425/CON). Both applications had come before the Working Party for comment at the time of their determination by the Council. The officer recommended that members of the Working Party should acquaint themselves with the decisions (to dismiss the appeals) and the associated Inspector’s report, in the expectation that revised proposals may be submitted and come before the Working Party in due course – the Working Party agreed that this would be appropriate and officers are to provide access to the decision letter and inspectors report.

 

Resolved:              That the information be received.